You lost me after your second sentence. Everything in between felt like corporate filler rather than genuine concern for what I experienced as a guest.
Your first mistake was saying “as discussed.” From a guest perspective, what was previously discussed is irrelevant in this moment. I do not feel valued, understood, or empathized with. Instead of addressing the issue with sincerity, your response focused on business terminology and “proper channels,” which honestly means nothing to me as the guest affected by this situation.
What should have happened was a response that showed accountability, empathy, and reassurance that the property would do everything possible to make this right. That is what guests remember.
At this point, I do not blame you personally. This appears to be a larger issue with the management and standards of the property overall. While staying there, I observed employees handling breakfast food with cigarettes behind their ears, wearing street clothes without proper food service attire, and staff sitting on lobby furniture while guests entered the property. None of this reflects professionalism or care for the guest experience.
Originally, my only concern was being bitten by a bed bug. However, because your response chose to focus on what was “previously discussed” and “proper channels,” it opened the door to the larger concerns I observed during my stay.
As a branded establishment, I strongly encourage you to reevaluate not only operational standards, but also how guests are communicated with during difficult situations.
At this point, I am done engaging on this matter. The handling of this situation has left me questioning whether continuing this conversation is even worth my time.
You lost me after your second sentence. Everything in between felt like corporate filler rather than genuine concern for what I experienced as a guest.
Your first mistake was saying “as discussed.” From a guest perspective, what was previously discussed is irrelevant in this moment. I do not feel valued, understood, or empathized with. Instead of addressing the issue with sincerity, your response focused on business terminology and “proper channels,” which honestly means nothing to me as the guest affected by this situation.
What should have happened was a response that showed accountability, empathy, and reassurance that the property would do everything possible to make this right. That is what guests remember.
At this point, I do not blame you personally. This appears to be a larger issue with the management and standards of the property overall. While staying there, I observed employees handling breakfast food with cigarettes behind their ears, wearing street clothes without proper food service attire, and staff sitting on lobby furniture while guests entered the property. None of this reflects professionalism or care for the guest experience.
Originally, my only concern was being bitten by a bed bug. However, because your response chose to focus on what was “previously discussed” and “proper channels,” it opened the door to the larger concerns I observed during my stay.
As a branded establishment, I strongly encourage you to reevaluate not only operational standards, but also how guests are communicated with during difficult situations.
At this point, I am done engaging on this matter. The handling of this situation has left me questioning whether continuing this conversation is even worth my time.
And I've read how other reviewers that didn't give a positive review were responded to. Very poor and improper handling of situations. Please hopefully your upper management goes through the "proper channels" and provides your team with PROPER training.