Clifford Rieders is not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also genuinely kind and generous with his time. He took time out of his very busy day to speak with me, listen carefully, and give me clear direction on how to approach my situation. His recommendations were thoughtful, insightful, and extremely helpful.
What stood out most to me is that he did not have to do any of this. He had no obligation, yet he still took the time, and that meant more to me than I can say. That level of professionalism, integrity, and humanity is rare today, and it was truly heartfelt.
I am deeply grateful for his guidance and highly recommend Clifford Rieders and his firm for those seeking experienced, thoughtful legal insight.
I dont feel they operate legally in their mandate for medical records with no retainer. They certainly don't operate ethically. My letter to the bar:1/18/2026
Holiday Sayers
31 E Main Street, 602
New Kingstown, PA 17072
Re: Ethics Concern Regarding Pre-Retainer Demand for Medical Records
Rieders Travis Law Firm (Rieders, Travis, Dohrmann, Mowery, Humphrey & Waters)
Specifically: Cliff Rieders
Date of Incident: January 16, 2026
Dear Disciplinary Counsel,
I am writing to report a concern regarding the intake practices of a Pennsylvania law firm, Rieders Travis Law Firm (Rieders, Travis, Dohrmann, Mowery, Humphrey & Waters) arising from my interaction with the firm, especially Cliff Rieders,
on January 16, 2026.
I contacted the firm seeking legal representation. During the intake process, the firm required that I provide my medical records as a condition of representation. At the time of this request, no retainer agreement, engagement letter, or written confidentiality or scope-of-representation terms had been provided or executed.
I expressed concern about releasing sensitive medical records without a retainer or formal engagement in place and asked whether representation could be confirmed, or whether limited or alternative information could be provided for screening purposes. Following my refusal to release medical records without engagement terms, the firm declined to represent me.
I understand that attorneys may request information to evaluate potential matters. I am concerned that mandating disclosure of full medical records prior to the formation of an attorney-client relationship, and conditioning representation on such disclosure, may exceed what is reasonably necessary for an initial consultation and may expose prospective clients to unnecessary confidentiality and privacy risks.
I am submitting this letter for review as a potential issue under the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct, including but not limited to Rule 1.18 (Duties to Prospective Clients) and related confidentiality obligations.
I am not requesting the Disciplinary Board review whether this intake practice complies with applicable ethical standards.
I am available to provide documentation or additional information if requested.