I am submitting this statement to formally document a series of concerns regarding attorney Elizabeth “Beth” Tener of Greenspoon Marder LLP, based on my observations and the record of interactions in which her conduct appeared inconsistent with the ethical and professional expectations set by the Florida Bar.
Across multiple communications, there have been recurring issues that raised questions about the level of candor, accuracy, and fairness exercised in her role as counsel. Several statements and directives made to opposing parties and third parties appeared, in context, to be incomplete, misleading, or inconsistent with the requirements of Florida law or existing court orders. These patterns prompted concerns related to the standards reflected in Rules 4-8.4 (Misconduct), 4-3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal), and 4-1.2(d) (Prohibited Conduct) within the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.
The conduct at issue contributed to unnecessary conflict, blurred established legal boundaries, and suggested a willingness to take positions that emphasized tactical advantage over strict compliance with lawful procedures. While vigorous representation is part of the profession, it must remain within the clear ethical limits that safeguard public trust in the legal system.
These concerns are not the product of a single misunderstanding. Rather, the collected communications show a consistent pattern in which advice, representations, or strategic directives appeared to depart from what the rules require or what court-ordered compliance demanded. Such patterns, if verified, would be damaging not only to those directly involved but to the broader expectation of integrity that the legal profession depends on.
Due to the seriousness of these issues, the matter is being prepared for submission to the Florida Bar’s Attorney Consumer Assistance Program (ACAP), with the possibility of referral to federal oversight authorities should the underlying evidence justify additional review. This action is not taken lightly. It reflects a deliberate effort to ensure accountability and to uphold the standards that all members of the Florida Bar pledge to maintain.
It is troubling to encounter conduct from an attorney at a long-established law firm that prompts this level of concern. Attorneys hold a position of public trust, which requires honesty, lawful guidance, and respect for the limits of advocacy. When conduct appears to fall short of those expectations, it affects not only the immediate parties but the credibility of the profession as a whole.
If the Bar’s formal investigation substantiates these concerns, appropriate disciplinary measures would be warranted to prevent future harm. The legal system relies on officers of the court to act with integrity, follow the law, and avoid actions that could mislead, obscure, or undermine due process.
This notice is provided in good faith and is based on documented interactions and supporting materials. It serves as both a record of concern and an indication that all relevant materials will be submitted to the appropriate regulatory bodies for independent review. The overarching purpose is to help ensure that the standards of professionalism, honesty, and legal compliance remain intact for the benefit of clients, colleagues, and the public.
The public deserves attorneys who practice with integrity and respect for the rule of law. The conduct reflected in the record raises significant questions, and a transparent evaluation by the appropriate authorities is necessary to protect the credibility and accountability of the legal profession in Florida.